LEISA Magazine • 22.4 •
December 2006
Adapting SRI in Tamil Nadu, India
T.M. Thiyagarajan
Tamil Nadu is India’s southernmost state. About two million hectares
of rice is grown, mostly under irrigation, with an average yield of 5 t/ha.
Average rice productivity is the highest in the country. There is consensus,
however, about the need to improve production, as water shortages are becoming
increasingly severe, and overall production has stagnated in recent years.
The System of Rice Intensification, or SRI, was introduced only five years ago,
and is currently the subject of much debate among agricultural scientists. But
farmers are adopting it without bothering about the controversies raised. This
is basically because of the visible results that SRI farmers achieve. By employing
different principles which includes younger seedlings and wider spacing, SRI
offers higher yields and incomes, lower cultivation costs, and other benefits.
This article describes these principles on the basis of the experiences of farmers
in this state.
Younger seedlings
In conventional rice production, farmers are recommended to transplant seedlings
at between 25 and 30 days. In practice, seedlings are often transplanted later,
depending on the availability of water or labour. When older seedlings are planted,
the main tiller produces a poor early panicle, and the other tillers produce
panicles later. This reduces crop growth and yields. SRI involves using younger
seedlings. But, when advised to use 9-12 day old seedlings, farmers immediately
become concerned, fearing that they may not be sufficiently strong to withstand being pulled out and transplanted.
However, experience shows that not only are these young seedlings strong enough
to withstand transplanting, they are also in a better condition to do so.
Nursery
Farmers in Tamil Nadu usually have a specific field earmarked for a nursery,
which receives more manure. Sprouted seeds are broadcast in a well puddled and
levelled nursery field. While seed rates of 20 kg per hectare are commonly recommended,
farmers often use seed rates which are 3 to 5 times higher. This means that
the seedlings are densely spaced, and as a result, less healthy. SRI practitioners
recommend a 20 x 20 cm spacing and only one seedling per hill (see below), so
only 25 seedlings are required per m2, instead of 150 to 200. The wider spacing
and single seedling per hill drastically reduces the seed requirements in the
nursery, with only 7.5 kg of seed required per hectare instead of 20 kg. As
a result, the nursery size can be reduced from 800 m2 to 100 m2.
In conventional cultivation, seedlings are uprooted, washed, bundled and transported
to the main field. Quite often, the main fields are far away, so there is a
long time gap between uprooting and planting. SRI practitioners try to avoid
any establishment delays, and/or to remove the seedlings with the base medium,
thus minimising any root damage and possible transplanting shock. This might
appear to require more time and energy, but in fact it does not, as farmers
use far fewer seedlings. Another positive aspect is that it is possible to have
the nursery in one corner of the main field so that transfer time can be minimised.
The experience of Tamil Nadu farmers has shown that these apparently small changes
have a large impact on the final outcome.
Plant density
In Tamil Nadu planting distances of 15 x 10 cm and of 20 x 10 cm are conventionally
recommended for short and long duration rice respectively. These recommendations
suggest a density of two or three seedlings per hill, although farmers generally
plant 4 to 6 seedlings. By contrast, SRI farmers leave wider spaces between
the hills, and plant a single seedling in each. Farmers are apprehensive about
whether there will be enough panicles per unit area, but rice has a self-adjusting
mechanism with regard to tillering: closer planting reduces the tillering of
individual plants and wider spacing enables higher tillering rates (depending
in both cases on the fertility of the soil).
Rice plants have a growth stage referred to as “time of the last productive
tiller”, which means that only tillers present at that time will become
productive. This occurs between 20 and 35 days after planting in conventional
cultivation. The goal then is to obtain the desired number of tillers before
this time. When single seedlings of less than 14 days are planted at a wider
spacing, each has nearly 10 days more for tillering. The wider spacing also
gives the seedlings a larger zone from which to draw their nutrients. A spacing
wider than 20 x 20 cm is appropriate if soil fertility is good. Some experiments
in Tamil Nadu have shown spacings of 25 x 25cm to be better, and similar distances
are recommended in Andhra Pradesh.
Transplanting
One of the major hurdles in the adoption of SRI lies in the transplanting process.
In contrast to conventional rice production, transplanting in SRI needs to facilitate
later weeding. So seedlings need to be placed in rows, preferably following
what is known as “square planting”: a model which allows weeders
to pass in both directions. Farmers in Tamil Nadu do this in different ways,
the simplest of which is to use nylon ropes to mark the correct spacing. Matchsticks
or small pieces of coloured cloth are inserted in the nylon rope at the desired
spacing, facilitating an even spacing along the row. Wooden rods with markings
at the desired spacing are fixed at either end of the field to shift the lines.
The Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University in Andhra Pradesh has worked
with farmers to develop a hand-drawn marker used to make marks in a square pattern
every 25 cm. The marker is now very popular in this state. But while this can
save some labour and time compared to line sowing, its effectiveness depends
on the field conditions. If the soil is too wet, the marker will sink and not
mark the spaces corrrectly. This reduces the effectiveness of using the weeder.
The marker is best used a few days after puddling, when the soil has settled
and moisture levels are not too high. Efforts are currently being made to develop
a floating arrangement to avoid the marker sinking.
Weeder use
Different evaluations have shown that weeding is one of the most important
factors in SRI. This represents a major change in rice cultivation, and has
a noticeable effect on the growth of the plants. Farmers in Tamil Nadu use two
types of weeders. One is the rotary weeder, which is light (2 kg) and can therefore
be used by women labourers. It can be used in plant spacings of 20 x 20 cm or
wider, and is very useful for small scale and marginal farmers who can do the
weeding without having to hire labourers. The other model, the cono-weeder,
is used with wider spacings. It weighs approximately 7 kg and is mostly suitable
for use by men. It has two cones which stir the soil thoroughly. Large farms
have also introduced motorised weeders, though these are only successful if
the square planting and lines are perfect.
Existing weeds are incorporated into the soil when the weeders are used every
10 days. This results in a considerable incorporation of biomass (more than
700 kg/ha according to different studies) and, more importantly, the maintenance
of nutrients within the soil. Studies have also shown that weeder use causes
an “earthing up” action which helps new roots to be formed. Further
studies are required to analyse common farming practices, such as allowing animal
grazing during fallow periods in fields where weed infestation is low, and the
advantages and possibilities of green manure.
Shallow and intermittent irrigation
In Tamil Nadu, rice is grown in many different conditions, with water availability
dictated by the monsoon rains. The north east monsoon season (between October
and December) is the main rice season in both irrigated and rainfed environments.
Farmers adopting SRI initially considered irrigating the fields in the evenings
and draining the excess water the following morning. This, however, proved to
be time consuming and labour intensive. At the same time, water scarcity led
scientists to focus on other ways of saving water in agriculture, looking in
particular at the possibilities of “improving” SRI.
In conventional rice production in Tamil Nadu it is generally recommended to
flood the field with a layer of water up to 5 cm deep, one day after the disappearance
of flood water. However, adoption of this recommendation by farmers is poor,
due mainly to problems associated with water availability. No definite recommendation
is given for irrigation under SRI, except that the soil should remain as aerobic
as possible. Current practice among SRI farmers is to provide a water layer
of up to 2.5 cm after cracks develop in the surface of the soil up to the panicle
initiation stage. After that they provide the same depth one day after the surface
water has disappeared. Development of surface cracks does not imply that the
soil is dry or that the cracks will be deep enough to cause nutrient losses.
Rather, it happens due to the formation of small hairline cracks in soil which
is still moist but has no standing water. The soil is not allowed to dry out.
This approach requires regular monitoring of the field, which is especially
important in cascade irrigation areas and during the monsoon.
A comparative evaluation
The positive effects of SRI on rice production and water saving has prompted
the submission of a policy note to the Government of Tamil Nadu. In a swift
decision making process, the State Government sanctioned 25 million rupees
to evaluate SRI in two major rice growing areas of the state: the Cauvery
Delta and the Tamiraparani river basin in south Tamil Nadu. This was carried
out through 100 Adaptive Research Trials in selected farmers’ fields during
the wet season of 2003-2004.
The trials compared SRI with conventional cultivation on 1000 m2 plots without
replication. All participating farmers were supplied with the required inputs
and a weeder, and were asked to follow the different component parts of SRI.
Grain yields were recorded carefully by collecting all the panicles from five
randomly selected 1 m2 areas from both the SRI and the conventional plots,
and recording the grain weight after threshing and cleaning. The yield was
reported at a 14% moisture level.
In the Tamiraparani basin, the grain yields recorded under SRI ranged from
4214 to 10 655 kg/ha and those from conventional cultivation between 3887
to 8730 kg/ha. Average results showed a yield advantage of 1570 kg/ha under
SRI. Thirty-one farmers recorded yields of more than 8 t/ha under SRI, while
only three farmers obtained those yields using conventional cultivation. Yield
increase was associated with an increased number of panicles per m2 and an
increased number of filled grains per panicle. Of the 10 varieties used by
the farmers, three were found to perform very well under SRI. Square planting
was the only constraint faced by the farmers as they found that their former
practice of random planting was much quicker.
Results in the Cauvery Delta area were similar. The additional yield
advantage from SRI ranged from 500 to 1500 kg/ha. Increased grain yield
under SRI was mainly attributed to a greater number of lengthy and
productive tillers with an increased number of filled grains per panicle, and
to fewer unfilled grains. Between 300 to 400 mm of water was reported to
be saved through intermittent irrigation.
Adoption of SRI by farmers
SRI is attractive to small and marginal farmers because of the higher yields,
the lower seed requirement and the relative ease of weed management. Results
obtained by farmers throughout the state have convinced the Tamil Nadu State
Department of Agriculture to actively promote SRI through its extension service.
They set up demonstration trials in major rice producing areas of the state
in the 2004, 2005 and 2006 rice seasons. Extension has helped spread SRI to
farmers, as have the more informal farmer-to-farmer exchanges. The benefits
of using younger seedlings, wider spacing and weeder use are best demonstrated
by the visible results, which once seen by farmers lead to high uptake. Many
NGOs are also taking a keen interest in this approach.
T.M.Thiyagarajan. Rice Research Station/Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tirur 602 025,
Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: tmthiyagarajan@yahoo.com
References
- Rajendran, R., V. Ravi, T. Nadanasabapathy, K. Valliappan, S. Ramanathan, T.
Jayaraj, and V. Balasubramanian, 2004. Modified rice mat nursery for producing
robust young seedlings in 15 days for early transplanting and enhanced productivity
under transformed rice cultivation. Accepted, Indian Journal of Agronomy.
- Uphoff, N. 2003. Higher yields with fewer external inputs? The System of Rice
Intensification and potential contributions to agricultural sustainability. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 1, 38-50.
- Uphoff, N., E.C.M. Fernandes, L.P. Yuan, J. Peng, S. Rafaralahy and J. Rabenandrasana
(eds.), 2002. Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification: Proceedings
of an International Conference, Sanya, China, April 1-4,2002.
Cornell International Institute for Food, Agriculture and Development, Ithaca,
New York, U.S.A.
- Vijayakumar, M., S.D. Sundarsingh, N.K. Prabhakaran, T.M. Thiyagarajan. 2004.
Effect of SRI practices on the yield attributes, yield and water productivity
of rice (Oryza sativa L). Acta Agronomica Hungarica 52(4): 399-408.